Table 19. Regions indicating electoral cleavages with high politicization and socialization coefficients in the 2016 State Duma election

Region 2016 2021
  Pc/Sc Pol/Soc Pc/Sc Pol/Soc
Adygea 42.6/63.1 AD/Urb 44.7/38.3 SE-GO/Dem
Amur Obl. + Jewish AO     49/51.3 AD/Urb
Buryatia     61.2/66.8 AD/Urb
Altai Republic 38.7/60.4 AD/Urb    
Kalmykia 34.8/28.9 AD/Dem    
Komi     33.1/37.7 SE-MLSP/Urb
Chuvashia 34.8/59.4 PD-2/Urb    
Astrakhan Obl. 39.5/31.8* SE-MLSP/SWB    
Belgorod Obl. 61.9/37.9 AD/Urb 70.7/46.7 AD/Urb
Vladimir Obl.     31.5/55.6 New/Dem
Voronezh Obl. 56.2/36.3 AD/Urb 62.4/33 PD-2/Urb
Ivanovo Obl. 31/01/1953 AD/Urb 33.7/31.6 SE-MLSP/Urb
Kaliningrad Obl. 32.7/36.1 AD/Urb 51.3/30.4 AD/Urb
Kursk Obl. 31/07/1942 AD/Urb    
Lipetsk Obl. 59.9/58 AD/Urb 50/53.4 PD-1/Urb
Magadan Obl. 35.2/42.4 AD/EI 66.7/31.5 SE-GO/Dem
Mordovia     39.6/42.4 PD-1/Urb
Murmansk Obl. 30/41.8 AD/Dem    
Nizhny Novgorod Obl.     45.4/40.6 PD-2/Urb
Omsk Obl.     32.9/52.2 New/Urb
Oryol Obl. 31.6/45.1 AD/Urb 65.1/52.4 SE-GO/Urb
Penza Oblast 39.8/45.5 AD/Urb 58.5/51.9 PD-2/Urb
Primorsky Krai     48/31.8 SE-GO/Urb
Rostov Obl.     45.4/34.8 PD-2/Urb
Ryazan Obl. 44.7/44.1 AD/Dem 67/52.6 PD-1/Urb
Samara Obl. 32.9/50.8 AD/Urb 60.4/65.7 PD-2/Urb
Sakhalin Obl.     61.8/40.4* HD/Dem
Smolensk Obl.     51.3/46.5 AD/Urb
Tver Obl. 48.6/47.9 AD/Urb 54/40.3 SE-GO/Urb
Tomsk Obl.     41.9/54 New/Urb
Tula Obl.     39.5/34.5 AD/Urb
Tyumen Obl.     57.3/45.4 AD/Urb
Ulyanovsk Obl. 48.5/70.6 AD/Urb 42.1/60.5 PD-1/Urb
Khakassia     45.4/46.2* AD/Dem
Khanty-Mansi AO 34.9/43.7 AD/EI    
Chukotka     59.4/76.3 AD/Urb
Yamalo-Nenets AO 39.5/32 AD/Urb    
Sevastopol+Crimea     33.9/35.7 AD/Urb

* The second electoral cleavage in terms of hierarchy, in all other cases it is the first.