Table 3. Regression models of the relationships between the main political dimensions and cleavages (sub-dimensions) in three (model 1) and four (model 2) subject areas — all 14 parties

  Political dimension – 1 Political dimension – 2 Political dimension – 3 Political dimension – 4
  Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Coefficient of determination – R2(p-level) 0.999 (0.000) 0.983 (0.000) 0.998 (0.000) 0.921 (0.000) 0.979 (0.000) 0.938 (0.000) 0.968 (0.000) 0.998 (0.000)
  Beta coefficient (standard error)
  Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Domestic policy: government–opposition 0.543 (0.035) 0.291 (0.082) 0.402 (0.022) 0.543 (0.088) 0.168 (0.059)      
Domestic policy: loyalists–opposition -0.183 (0.019)   0.182 (0.030)   0.315 (0.058)      
Domestic policy: Green Alternative             -0.428 (0.098) -0.672 (0.025)
Socioeconomic: government–opposition 0.347 (0.030) 0.563 (0.080)           0.162 (0.024)
Socioeconomic: liberals–Green Alternative     -0.136 (0.026)   0.334 (0.071)   -0.243 (0.080)  
Socioeconomic: liberals–social protectionists             0.563 (0.083) 0.422 (0.040)
Socioeconomic: New People–loyalists           -0.372 (0.088)    
Systemic: "hawks"–"doves" 0.562 (0.016)   -0.419 (0.031)          
Systemic: Soviet traditionalists–progressives     0.071 (0.029)   -0.620 (0.070)      
Systemic: New People -0.059 (0.014)              
Systemic: Russian Party for Social Justice     -0.229 (0.025)          
Foreign policy: "hawks"–"doves"   0.558 (0.052)   -0.668 (0.088)        
Foreign policy: authoritarians–democrats               -0.234 (0.036)
Worldview: liberals–conservatives           0.323 (0.096)   -0.341 (0.025)
Worldview: Soviet traditionalists–progressives           0.685 (0.094)    
Worldview: UR vs. RPFJ and Civic Platform               0.081 (0.024)